The other first this week was Isaac's first soccer game. That one became a sermon illustration this morning. I have the kid picking flowers and wandering around the field holding hands with a little girl.
Justin Pickering
This blog reflects my own opinions and perspectives. They are my own and do not reflect those of the Army, Chaplain Corps, or my wife (perhaps the most important part of the disclaimer).
Sunday, April 13, 2014
Firsts
Palm Sunday
Waiting for my second worship service to start this morning
(The first was Airborne Chapel on Ft Benning), I thought for a while about Palm
Sunday. There is a darkness to the day
that I don’t think we discuss. We arm
our children with bright green branches and parade them through the aisles. We present out choral “hallelujahs” with
neatly pressed robes or by jumping up and down and swinging our arms
around. We present a contrast to the
angry mobs shouting for blood on Thursday night and Friday morning.
The shouting crowds in Jerusalem (and the doxology we sing
on Sunday) are not in contrast of the crucifixion of Friday. It is a few yards down the same fiver. We cheer God when God fits what we want. We turn to a murderous mob when God’s will no
longer fits what we find comfortable.
Luke explicitly tells us that the multitude of his disciples
cheered the entry of Jesus into Jerusalem.
At best, these people abandoned Christ.
No doubt many also called for his death before a Roman governor.
There is a darkness to Palm Sunday, but it is not just the
darkness of a crowd that turned on Jesus.
It is the darkness of our own hearts.
This morning, when Emily sat beside me in church she told me Isaac was with the kids for the palm procession. Please do not misunderstand my reflection. The procession and focus Dr. Elder took was a spiritually deep, biblically focused, thought-proving sermon. Basically, it was the type of sermon we’ve come to expect at FBC Columbus. His was a far more profound reflection than what has preceded my “disclaimer.”
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Ethics & the End of the Cold War
Disclaimer: All of
this is purely my opinion. I am aware
that I am oversimplifying some of the moral positions of the Cold War and War
on Terror. Let’s be honest, most people
function from oversimplifications and generalities. Because that’s how people function, I think
my questions are legitimate.
"We have men of science, too few men of God. We have grasped the mystery of the atom and
rejected the Sermon on the Mount. The world has achieved brilliance without
conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We
know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know
about living. If we continue to develop our technology without wisdom or
prudence, our servant may prove to be our executioner." – Omar Bradley
I have recently spent a great deal of time with the newest
lieutenants in the Army. They are in
their final training before beginning their military careers. Most are in their early twenties. The Soviet Union broke apart the year many of
our current students were born. I can’t
help but wonder what this might mean for how they understand ethics and
geopolitics. I was a child at the end of
the cold war, and missed most of the bomb drills in schools and the fear of
nuclear holocaust that those who grew up in the 50s & 60s might have
seen. I saw fallout shelter signs on the
YMCA building. When my friends and I
played army, we were always fighting WWIII against the Soviet Union. I saw all of the 80s movies where good
defeated evil embodied by the US and USSR. As a child we knew that that both
nations had the capacity to destroy life as the world knew it. I was too young to find it frightening, but there
always felt like the conflict was one with a clear, moral right and wrong.
I point this out because General Bradley’s comment called
for people to step back and ask ethical questions. He saw a society losing contact with his
moral foundations with possibly disastrous consequences for all of
mankind. The new officers entering
today’s military have no memory of this period in history. They don’t remember having a clearly defined
enemy that is “evil.” What they are
intimately acquainted with is the war on “terror.” Terror is not a clearly defined enemy. It’s fighting a concept. It requires adaptability and flexibility by
our armed forces, which they excel in performing.
My question is what impact does this have on the ethical
development of our future leaders? We
fight an enemy that requires different tactics in different settings. My fear is that because the enemy is a
broader concept instead of a specific nation-state our moral engagement becomes
clouded. We view our ethical foundations
as situational instead of how we carry out the mission. It makes instilling a professional ethic in
18-22 year olds entering the military very different.
Sunday, September 29, 2013
This week's thought
This week, I’ve been reading in the gospel of Matthew. Again and again through the gospel we see people
challenge Jesus with religious questions.
In chapters 21-22, Matthew presents a series of questions specifically
from religious leaders seeking to trip Jesus up and discredit him. Theoretical questions seeking to create
nuanced theological argument that had little to do with daily life were pitched(16.1ff;
22.15ff; 21.23ff) He was baited with
questions on morality (19.3ff; 22.34).
Then comes Matthew 22.46.
“And no one was able to answer him a word, nor from that day did anyone
dare to ask him any more questions.”
Jesus’ critics were silenced because he spoke with authority, which is
another theme in Matthew. The point I
think is important for modern Christians is that Jesus provided reasoned
discussion on the true issue behind the questions. He didn’t get caught up quibbling about
money, marriage, or ritual. He focused
on divided loyalties. He pushed the
Pharisees to examine the purpose of ritual and the impact of sin on
humanity. Instead of dismissing the
questions, he pushed them past the surface level discussion.
This skill is one I fear we are not developing in
evangelical Christianity. I frequently
get to listen to how people respond when their beliefs are challenged. What I hear Christians do is take a hard
stand and simply defend it by proclaiming, “This is what God says. You’re wrong.” OK, they may not be quite that blunt, but
it’s what is communicated clearly to whoever they’re addressing. The conversation quickly slides into two
people talking past one another without truly addressing the underlying
beliefs. I’ve watched this on any number
of the popular culture wars (which I’ll spare everyone from rehashing). I see this in discussions about the
exclusivity of the gospel. Christians
are getting the opportunity to engage in meaningful discussion, but we get
sidetracked by the desire to be right.
This is the point where I’d normally begin inserting my list
of steps to take. I have neither the
time nor space to flesh out the implications, and such is not my goal. I think the Church needs something more
foundational than a list of skills or tasks.
We need to change how we think in order to change how we interact with
our society. Having said this, I offer
the list of changes with very little explanation or support.
1.
Learn to think deeply. People are tired of the church presenting
answers that seem inconsistent or shallow.
While “The Bible says so” might be an answer that is perfectly true and
legitimate answer in a discussion, but people want to understand why the Bible
says so, and we should strive to understand the why, not just the what.
2.
Be
humble. This one is biblical,
but many outside of the Church have legitimate criticism of Christians for
sounding (and often being) arrogant and dismissive of others. This is truly a spiritual crisis that is
important not only for how we relate to others but how we relate to God.
3.
Learn
to listen. This one is actually
associated with thinking deeply. Listen
to what people say. Look for the
motives, fears, or desires that are motivating them. Doing so helps us understand the person and
their beliefs.
4.
Learn
to communicate. You won’t be a
perfect communicator. You simply have to
know how to communicate genuine concern and compassion.
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Not even trying to catch up
After the Labor Day Dove Shoot at the Farm. |
I'll probably start posting more about the ministry because the travel stories obviously won't be as frequent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)